Risk Modeling Essay

Introduction A risk is a chance of something going wrong or something that cause threat to an organization or an establishment. The process of risk management refers to the use of financial measuring techniques to determine the cumulative risk in a financial assortment. Financial institutions or individuals are always exposed to different types of risks in their operating environments. Some risks are usually unavoidable whereas some cannot. Risk modeling therefore presents a way of measuring and determining their overall effect. Risk modeling takes into account all the variables which are involved when covering a risk. There are   two books under study and they include: Risk Model Textbook and Risk Model Sewall. The two books have several similarities in their approach to risk modeling and they differ in some ways as discussed below. Similarities The two books both address the effects of risk in an organization. The two books have a similar way of assessing risks which is based on probability of occurrence. They further discuss their impact on an organization. The two books lay a major weight on discussing the risk of information whereby a detailed account is given Both books present similar ways of dealing with risks. It is stated categorically that Information security, management and users, and information technology all must work together in order to achieve better results at the end of the study. Both books propose having an insurance cover as one of the best ways in managing the different types of risks discussed in the books. Both books address similar challenges and solutions to risk management. They also look at historical information as one of the best ways to analyze risks. Differences In risk model text book, there is a systematic approach on the whole process of risk modeling. The book starts by looking at some basic definitions of risks and gives a general overview of risk. Whereas, in risk model Sewall the approach is not systematic and the author does not give adequate introduction as far as risk modeling is concerned. Risk Model Sewall looks at risk from a cultural and a social point of view. This is evident from the initial stages of the book where the author gives an account of cultural cognition of risk. On the other hand, risk model text book looks at risk from a business man’s perspective.   This can be seen although the book whereby the author analyses the different types of risks quantitatively. Risk model Sewall gives a logical and more practical approach to risk. The issues presented in the book whereby the author addresses the different types of risks that people are likely to encounter in their day to day activities. Consequently, risk model text book looks at risk in more theoretical and mathematical manner. This can be seen from the numerous calculations used in analyzing risks some of which may not be realized in a practical setting. The risk model text book gives recommendations on the ways that can be applied to control the risks and gives a detailed summary on the whole process of risk management. On the other hand, the risk model Sewall just give practical examples but does not give   detailed summary on the whole process of risk management. In the risk model text we get a definition of   risk management, risk identification and risk control. We then get an insight of how risk is identified and assessed. Assess risk based on probability of occurrence and impact on an organization. We are then taken through a procedure to grasp fundamental aspect of documenting risk through the creation of risk assessment. This Book is better than the one by Sewall because of its systematic approach towards risk modeling. The book starts by giving information on what is going to be covered and ends up with a summary which gives an account of what has been covered in the book. On the other hand the Risk model by Sewall does not give an organized and insight coverage of Risk modeling which makes it unsuitable for someone who wants to analyze the whole process of risk modeling.

The Christian View Of God - 1647 Words

With recent technology offering a more comprehensive perspective of the current global atrocities, the existence of evil has never been more prevalent. If evil is defined as extreme suffering, premature death, and moral corruption, its existence questions the Christian view of God. The Christian God is an all-seeing, all-powerful being of moral perfection. Because these two truths cannot coexist, the fact that evil exists disproves the existence of the Christian God. If God is omnipotent, He could prevent any injustice. Since injustice does exist, it is necessary to modify either our perception of God s morality of, the extent of his power, or the limitations of human understanding. It is unlikely that God allows for the existence of evil due to a moral reason. This view of morality comes from our modern interpretation of ethics and would need to justify the pain and prejudice evident in the human world, deeming it either neutral or good. Many of those who have experienced tremendous injustices also fail to reconcile the existence of God and evil. Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor, writes in his autobiographical work Night that I did not deny God s existence, but I doubted His absolute justice, (Wiesel, Ch. 3). It is an abuse of power to justify the suffering of others based on an end-goal without their consent or acknowledgment. If we accept this as fact, our perception of morality must change to include this defense of suffering. Thus, if the basis of faith and GodShow MoreRelatedChristian And Muslim Views Of The God2438 Words   |  10 Pagesyears, people have worshiped various Gods and idols, but by far Jesus Christ of Nazareth is now the most widely known religious figure in the world. He is central to Christianity, the largest religion in the world. In this paper, this writer will examine the Christian and Muslim views of the deity of Jesus. This paper will demonstrate the validity of the deity of Jesus Christ and the Trinity in response to the Muslims objection of Jesus Christ. The Christian and Muslim religions have many similaritiesRead More Comparing Islam and Christianity Essay735 Words   |  3 Pagesprominent differences include atonement, the identity of God, heaven, view of Jesus, and the perception of the Christian Bible. It is these not-so-subtle contrasts of thoughts that separate the two most prevalent religions in the world. One of the most important differences in Christianity and Islam is the concept of atonement. In Christianity, Jesus’ death on the cross allows Christians to repent from their sins and gain forgiveness from God. Conversely, in Islam there is no atonement from sinsRead MoreEssay on Christian Believe About the Sanctity of Human Life1309 Words   |  6 PagesChristian Believe About the Sanctity of Human Life Christians believe that God has given them the gift of life so therefore no one but God has the authority to end life or prevent new life. Exodus 20:13, â€Å"you shall not murder†, is an important biblical passage to the ‘sanctity of human life.’ It tells Christians initially that euthanasia, abortion and capital punishment are wrong although it is more complicated than that. Abortion is not mentioned in the BibleRead More Saint Augustine Essay1445 Words   |  6 Pagesmain figure in the development of orthodox Christian doctrine during the early Christian Church. Augustine was born in Northern Africa in AD 354. His father was a pagan and his mother a Christian. Though his parents were not extremely well to do, they had enough money to allow Augustine to obtain an education in the liberal arts. This education will eventually affect how he sees Christianity, especially concerning the use of neo-Platonic ideas in Christian theology. Augustine converted to orthodoxRead MoreChristian Worldview : A Worldview864 Words   |  4 Pagesof the world and second, an application of this view to life.† (Dr. John MacArthur, May 2006). A Christian worldview requires for us Christians to learn and know what the word of God teach us. For us Christians this worldview begins in Genesis chapter one verse one, with God creating the heavens and the earth. Christians should be altogether glad to embrace the certain and true mind of God the Father (Rom 11:34), God the Son (1 Cor. 2:16), and God the Spirit (Rom 8:27). In contrast to Peter, whoRead MoreCore Doctrines Are Apart Of The Christian Faith1488 Words   |  6 PagesGod: Core doctrines are apart of the Christian faith and should be taught no matter what the denomination is. Doctrines are not negotiable throughout the universal Christian churches. However, churches may have different dogmatic beliefs, because there are not set in stone and vary. Theology is defined by Beth Felker Jones as being â€Å"the study of the things of God, a God who loves the world.† Theology is a practice that affects Christians’ lives in many ways: the way that they think, live, and howRead MoreThe Christian Reality1003 Words   |  5 PagesThe Christian reality consists of both a physical and a supernatural world. Men for a long time have been aware of these two realities and yet many times have only looked at just one or the other. The Greek philosophers have held opposing views on what is real. These philosophies are known as idealism or realism. Each hold to truths that are found in Christian beliefs, but also contain beliefs that are opposed to Christian ity. Idealism holds to many ideas that can be accepted by Christians. OneRead MoreChristianity, Islam, And Judaism1375 Words   |  6 PagesIslam have similar beliefs in reference to their view of a deity, the afterlife, sin, salvation, and style of worship. The view each religion has of deity is one of monotheism, although Christians differ in that they have a Trinitarian monotheistic view instead of a strict one like the Jews and Muslims. Christians believe in the Trinity – God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Three parts all divided but also all one. Jesus – the Son of God – is recognized as the one who was sent to saveRead MoreDifferences Between Hebraic And Christian Worldview933 Words   |  4 Pages The Christian worldview has been influenced by various worldviews and ideologies. Because its roots are in the Hebraic worldview, Christianity shares similar outlooks on aspects of life and that which follows; however, there are definite differences between the two concerning morals and afterlife. Many of these differences between Hebraic and Christian worldview are due to the doctrine set by Jesus and the apostles. Platonic influence further altered the Christian worldview into the view that bec ameRead MoreChristian Teaching and Discussion About Euthanasia Essay1202 Words   |  5 PagesChristian Teaching and Discussion About Euthanasia The word euthanasia comes from two Greek words eu meaning good and thanatos meaning death. Literally it means a good death. Euthanasia is arranging for someone who has an incurable terminal illness to die as quickly and as painlessly as possible. It is the act of purposely aiding someone to die, instead of letting nature take its course. There are four main types of euthanasia these are: Voluntary, Involuntary

Rising Rate of Divorce in Present Society - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Rising Rate of Divorce in Present Society. Answer: Introduction: The research managed to collect both primary and secondary data relevant Magnagement to the research topic by using various research techniques. Data was collected from members of the society through the use of survey questionnaire administered among a selected heterogeneous sample representing the larger society (Milner, et al. 2013). The respondents comprised of both the divorced, currently married, those currently dating as well as other stakeholders in the marriage institution such as religious leaders, parents of both couples, civic leaders among the general members of the society. This group of people were willing to give information that was relevant and ensured that the research problem was adequately addressed. The research used a survey questionnaire whose structure was subdivided into three parts to enable the respondents to give adequate data. To determine the variations in the divorce rate among different, the first part of the questionnaire required the respondent to give information regarding their gender. The questionnaire was made easy to understand and answer by providing multiple choices from which the respondent was to choose the most appropriate answer to address the question (Vignoli Ferro, 2009). For instance, the respondent was required to mark in the provided boxes with five pre-defined choices including; Agree, Strongly Agree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree, and No Comment. The survey questionnaire was designed in a manner that enabled the research to answer to answer the research questions which included; What do you think is the main reason behind the increasing rate of divorce among couples? Does the number of years the couples have been in marriage affect the chances of divorce? What is your opinion on divorce? It was discovered that indeed, the rate of divorce is on the rise in the present society as compared to yester years. The respondents registered varied reactions on the validity of divorce with some supporting it especially where cases of unfaithfulness arose while others regarding it as an evil that leads to the suffering of the innocent children. It was discovered, that among those who were divorced, a large percentage of men moved on and got married again than their female counterparts who in most cases were observed to be living single lives. Moreover, among those who were divorced, the research observed that the divorce cases were higher among employed women who were financially stable than their counterparts who had no jobs and relied on their husbands for financial support (Hendershott, et al. 2009). It was discovered that children who were embroiled in the divorce caucus were psychologically Management affected and registered low performance in academic performance. A good number of couples who had divorced were observed to be engaged in alcohol drinking while at the same time, many of these couples especially women admitted that they were still in love with their couples and would wish to move back to the marriage if the spouses apologised and changed. On the other hand, a considerable number of divorced couples especially those from abusive marriages regretted getting married and admitted never to fall in love and get married again (Halford, et al. 2008). A mong those who were still in marriage, a good number admitted that they were not happy in the marriage and could wish to divorce. However, they admitted that they were held into the unhappy marriages due to reasons such as concern for their children as well as lack of financial capabilities to support themselves away from their spouses (Reimondos, et al. 2011). Unfaithfulness among couples was recorded as the biggest reason behind most divorce cases. The other reasons that were cited as being behind the increasing divorce rate were gender freedom, economic reasons, urbanization, social support, religion, legal systems, Babies as well as cultural factors. Regardless of whether marriage is built on the foundation of love or is arranged, all marriages entail compromise and understanding. It was discovered during the research that the main reasons behind divorce revolve around the general lack of compromise and understanding among couples. For instance, couples become unfaithful to one another because they fail to compromise their sexual feelings for the sake of their marriage, couples divorce for economic reasons because they fail to understand the economic situation of one another and the situation is similar to all the reasons behind divorce (Narayan Smyth, 2007). The widespread gospel of women empowerment across the world is also plays a significant role in the rising rates of divorce in the present society. The institution of marriage is based on tolerance, perseverance, submission and understanding. These are the tools that held marriages for a long time in the traditional days. However, today, with the gospel of women empowerment Management, women have assumed a different role. Most have misunderstood the concept of being equal to men and assume that being submissive means being subdued by men and as a result many easily do no preserve challenges and will simply walk out from their spouses in the name of gender freedom. Economic situations also play a significant role in the rate of divorce in the modern society. Divorce is a socioeconomic phenomenon heavily dependent on the economic growth, cultural support, available labour opportunities as well as career mobility (Booth Kee, 2011). Lack of the capability of the couple to provide for the needs of the family leads to high chances of divorce among such families. Cases of divorce are higher among the rural, uneducated populace of Aust ralia where there is a high rate of unemployment. The high rate of divorce in the present days is also attributed to urbanization. In the towns, people tend to mix with friends and colleagues from varied cultures. Through the cultural interaction and exchange, they tend to embrace divorce as opposed to the other conventional ways of domestic conflict resolution. Moreover, urbanization leads to the disintegration of the social fabric. For instance, as a result of a spouse being posted to work in the urban areas, the family social support is reduced as one spouse may be left to fend for themselves without proper guidance and counselling hence raising the chances of divorce. This research also established that religion is also one of the factors affecting divorce (Heard, 2011). It was discovered that divorce rates were high among couples who did not belong to the same religion. On the other hand, among the couples of the same religion, divorce cases were low. This is because religion provided a platform for the couples to sit down and be guided and counselled on marriage issues. Similarly, through religious doctrines, the couples could easily understand and respect the institution of marriage hence reducing the chances of divorce. Furthermore, babies were cited as one of the reasons behind divorce. Varied opinions among the couples on the issue of babies, for instance, the number of babies to have as well as the inability of one spouse to bear children is also a major factor that contributes to the high divorce rates in the present society. Conclusion Marriage is an important institution that shapes the existence of society Management. However, due to poor priorities that drive marriage in the modern days, cases of divorce are on the rise. For instance, marriage in the western countries such as Australia is founded upon sex than in the east. As the couples grow older, sex becomes less engaging and as a result cracks beginning forming on the relationship hence the reason behind the high cases of divorce among older couples in the west. The biggest casualty of the rising cases of divorce in the present society is the child who is innocent and does not deserve the predicament that comes as a result of the separation of the parents (Burns Scott, 2013). High are the cases of neglect as a result of the parent indulging in alcoholism as a way to release the stress of having lost a loved one through divorce. The children also are forced in many circumstances to change the learning environment as well as the living area which affects the overall performance of the child. For the sake of the children and the entire society, measures should be put in place by both parents to ensure that cases of divorce are reduced. Recommendation Measures have been put in place to reduce the rampant cases of divorce in the present society. However, much needs to be done to reduce the consequences of divorce to the society. Some of the measures to be put in place include; Adequate sensitization to make the public informed on the effects of divorce. Legal restrictions should be put in place to reduce divorce rate and ensure that the interests of children are taken care of in the event of divorce. References Booth, A. L., Kee, H. J. (2011). A Long?Run View Of The University Gender Gap In Australia. Australian Economic History Review, 51(3), 254-276. Burns, A., Scott, C. (2013). Mother-headed families and why they have increased. Routledge. De Vaus, D., Gray, M., Qu, L., Stanton, D. (2014). The economic consequences of divorce in Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, ebt014. Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. (2008). Strengthening couples' relationships with education: Social policy and public health perspectives. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 497. Heard, G. (2011). Socioeconomic marriage differentials in Australia and New Zealand. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 125-160. Hendershott, P. H., Ong, R., Wood, G. A., Flatau, P. (2009). Marital history and home ownership: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Housing Economics, 18(1), 13-24. Milner, A., Page, A., LaMontagne, A. D. (2013). Duration of unemployment and suicide in Australia over the period 19852006: an ecological investigation by sex and age during rising versus declining national unemployment rates. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 67(3), 237-244. Narayan, P. K., Smyth, R. (2007). What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(2), 401-425. Reimondos, A., Evans, A., Gray, E. (2011). Living-apart-together (LAT) relationships in Australia. Family matters, (87), 43. Popenoe, D. (2009). Cohabitation, marriage, and child wellbeing: A cross-national perspective. Society, 46(5), 429-436. Vignoli, D., Ferro, I. (2009). Rising marital disruption in Italy and its correlates. Demographic Research, 20, 11.

Was the New Deal A Success Essay Example

Was the New Deal A Success Essay 1) People supported Roosevelt in 1932 election because he was positive, energetic and made the American people feel good. He was full of good news, or at least how good things would be if he were to be elected. He made it out to be a crusade, and not just one for him, one for the people. He almost made them feel that they were electing themselves, not Franklin. D. Roosevelt. He promised the Americans a new deal. He really made the American people believe that he was going to make everything all right again. They trusted him greatly. Another reason for him getting elected was because of the opposition. The opposition was Hoover. Many Americans felt he was to blame to the depression, and to top it all he wasnt even acknowledging that there was actually a problem. People werent going to vote for someone who had made their lives awful, probably the only votes he did get was from the rich industrialists, whom he had helped. Hoover just put forward the argument that businesses work in cycles of boom and bust and that prosperity would soon return. That was his solution to the problem. He didnt help the people who needed help, he didnt believe social security was the responsibility of the government. Many Americans felt he was heartless. We will write a custom essay sample on Was the New Deal A Success specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Was the New Deal A Success specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Was the New Deal A Success specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Roosevelt was the complete opposite to Hoover. He believed in an active government, he had plans to spend money on the needy, and he was more than happy to ask for advice, unlike Hoover who felt he knew best. Roosevelt was a man of the people, the people choice, he filled them with hope, and anything was better than the alternative. 2) The photo is of a line of black people queuing for government relief on front of a poster made by the government. The poster is of a white family driving in a car all smiles, with the slogan Theres no way like the American way. The photographer is trying to show the hypocrisy of the government. In those days the blacks had life a lot worse then the whites. The depression hit them extremely hard. In 1937 there was a recession. This damaged Roosevelt badly. A lot more republicans got into congress, making it harder for him to get his bills through, and people were losing faith in him. He also laid of a lot people who his organizations employed a lot of them were black workers. The photographer is also trying to make the point of there being very little racial equality in America hes pretty much calling the government racist (black people in front of a white mans poster). 3) Source E is a Cartoon from an American newspaper. It shows Roosevelt working a pump to get the economy going again. Into the pump he keeps pouring millions of the taxpayers money. The pump is also very leaky. This cartoon isnt really for Roosevelt. Its saying that hes wasting millions of dollars of the taxpayers money. The cartoonist is saying that Roosevelt is doing a bad job, hes wasting taxpayers money trying to get the economy going again. The cartoonist is possibly a republican, and hes definitely not a fan of Roosevelt. The taxpayer is holding all the money too, showing that hes holding the burden of the nation too. This could make the cartoonist a rich taxpayer too. Source F is a cartoon showing Roosevelt with a rubbish bin. The caption is Getting rid of the rubbish. In the bin he is throwing out all of Hoovers principles, everything he said. Its got rugged individuals, a car in every garage, a pot of chicken, and a sign saying prosperity is just around the corner. There is a man (who is meant to be Hoover) and hes walking around the corner towards prosperity looking at a timetable. This cartoon is for Roosevelt. It shows how hes throwing out everything Hoover stood for, all the unrealistic targets that Hoover had, especially with the way the American economy was. Hes also thrown out the sign that says prosperity is just around the corner. Its saying that Hoover was always saying that. He was always hoping, never taking action, unlike Roosevelt whom was taking action by throwing out the rubbish and the bad in America. Its definitely anti Hoover. Source G is another cartoon showing an old man and woman. The old man is meant to be the American public, the old woman congress, and the doctor Roosevelt. Roosevelt is issuing new remedies to the old man. On the table next to the old man are loads of bottles labeled with all the organizations he set up for the new deal. Roosevelt is saying Of course we may have to change the remedies if we dont get results. I think that this cartoon is both for and against Roosevelt. I feel it is pro Roosevelt because its showing him trying to help. It shows he wants to help, and it putting a lot of effort and time in to helping. I feel it is against Roosevelt though because it is saying hes taking too long over it. He hasnt got a clearly defined plan to get America out of the depression, he just keeps changing it and hoping something will work. Congress is depicted as an old woman purely because an old woman is something that can easily be taken advantage of. Theyre frail and weak. Roosevelt uses congress to get his bills through with no problem, congress is a pushover, but thats because its made mostly from democrats. I feel somebody neutral probably drew it, as he tries to show both sides of the argument, for and against Roosevelt. 4) I feel that both are useful sources in telling us about public opinion towards the new deal, but I feel source I is probably more informative and more of the real public opinion less biased. I feel Source I is more useful because it is from a popular song. Everybody was singing it. Also what is said in the song is backed up by other reports too. Its not praising the New Deal, saying its amazing, but it is saying that its helping people and things are better. The song is what the people were thinking, how they felt about Roosevelt. He got them working again, he got them their wages, and he made them feel better about life. Roosevelts supporters wrote source H. It was used as part of his election campaign, and is quite clearly going to be biased. Bits of what is said can be backed up by other sources, but most of it is glorified to help make Roosevelt sound wonderful. 5) The main differences between Sources J and K are that Source J saying that. Roosevelt was hurting people by giving. He was taking away their prowess. A quote from the source says He didnt understand that when you give to people, you hurt them. This man is clearly stating that he feels The New Deal was a bad thing it made self respecting men into nothing. It diminished them if you like, Welfare kills a mans initiative. A dog you feed will not hunt. He feels the New Deal was almost making him out to be some kind of loser. Source K on the other hand said that Roosevelt was helping the American people. It was saying how he was a real bonus to their lives. The New Deal meant that ordinary people would have a better chance in life. Source K also said that people should be left to hunt for themselves, they should make something of themselves, not live of handouts, because after a while you become too dependent on the handouts and cant fend for yourself properly anymore. Source K however contradicts this once again by saying that the handouts were a good thing, and they were helping the people recover, and making their lives better, The idea was that all the forces of the community should be directed to making life better for ordinary people. Source K was written by Roosevelts Secretary of Labour. Because she worked for Roosevelt she was of course going to be slightly biased. She was also a member of the government anyway, so she would have agreed with their policies (well, most of them). She also wouldnt have been one of the people hit hard by the depression, so she would have more of an objective, non egotistic, view on things, and also maybe a bit of sympathy for them. 6) I agree with both the quotes, although I feel the second one is probably the truer of the two. I agree with the first because the New Deal did help many Americans. It didnt give them all self-respect but it certainly helped them to survive and get back on their feet. It did also give some people, not all, a boost in confidence. An American historian wrote source B in 1945. One things he says to back up what was said in the first quote are, What, then, are the major achievements of the New Deal? First comes the restoration of self-confidence. Source I has a line in the song which goes Hes got things in full sway, were all working and getting our pay. Those two quotes back up what is said in the first quote. I agree with the second quote more however mainly because of the last statement, It did not solve all Americas economic problems the Second World War did that. When the second world happened once again Europe was short of supplies. They needed goods which they could not get any more due to not being able to import them, or just not being able to produce them themselves. As America stayed out the war until the end it was able to supply these countries with goods, thus boosting trade dramatically. If the Second World War hadnt happened America would have taken many years longer to fully recover from the depression after all, it was the First World War that led to the boom in the first place, so obviously another world war would have the same effect. Source C says how if the Second World War hadnt happened then Roosevelt would have been in real trouble, The was rescued him and he seized on it like a drowning man. The are also sources to back up what is said earlier on in the quote. Source E for example shows how money is being wasted via a cartoon. Admittedly the cartoon is probably a bit biased, but at the same time it was clear from other sources and comments made from the time that many people felt that Roosevelt was wasting money on needless things. Source C also clearly backs this up. It says how before Roosevelt came into power there was a national debt of $19 billion, and after hed made his mark there was a debt of $250 billion. The government also may have become too powerful. Because of all the organizations it had formed, it was employing hundreds of thousands of Americans itself. This in turn meant it was paying these people too. So the government had a hand in everyones pocket if you like. They had control over the peoples money. Source C also says how 1 in 4 Americans relied on the government for employment. More evidence suggesting that Roosevelt had a little too much control. I feel Source C is a fairly reliable source too as it was written by a historian and he had many more facts, and more of an objective view. From this I feel that the New Deal was a success, but only at first. At first Roosevelt quickly helped many people by getting them jobs and helping them to survive. Unfortunately he may have gone too far with this and had too much control. He didnt really encourage his people to fend for themselves enough and in the end America became dependent on itself, not its people. Roosevelt ended up leaving the country with a huge national debt and if the Second World War hadnt happened I feel that Roosevelt would have kept pumping money into the schemes till America really was struggling and everything came back in his face. I think that these two people disagree about the New Deal purely because of who actually wrote them. Source J was written by a self made, proud, businessman. He had a lot of pride. Hed worked to get somewhere. When Roosevelt just started handing out money to people like him he didnt like it. He saw almost as an insult. He felt he didnt need it, he was able to find money and work for himself, and after all he was a proud man who was capable even in the middle of a depression. He felt people should fend for themselves, not live on handouts, he didnt like it one bit. It was almost as if Roosevelt giving him money was damaging his ego, it made him feel like he was being seen as a failure, when he felt he wasnt and that he could sort it out himself. It made him feel small.